1995-03-12: Structural Reform: New Architecture for a New Age (part 1)
Audio
Audio file
Content type |
Content type
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
||||
Title |
Title
Title
1995-03-12: Structural Reform: New Architecture for a New Age (part 1)
|
||||
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
||||
Description |
Description
Vol. III, No. XI
Transcription: William McDonough, UVA Sanford Lopater, With Good Reason Volume II, Number XI Structural Reform: New Architecture for a New Age Greeting We live in them and work in them. Yet how often do we consider how the buildings we occupy affect the way we live? We do just that next on With Good Reason. I'm Laura Womack. Music Background Who controls life aboard ship? The captain? Navigator? The purser? None of the above. The ship designer dictates life on board, because his decisions about how many cabins to include, their layout, and cargo space limit the captain's options. My first guest uses this example to illustrate how structural design subtlety but constantly influences our lives. My second guest adds to this theme. He's a psychologist who's studied the mental impact of architectural design. Now William McDonough joins us. He's an architect who teaches at the University of Virginia. William McDonough helped Wal-Mart incorporate design features at their new Lawrence, Kansas store that improved the indoor atmosphere and the outdoor environment. I asked him to explain what "green architecture" is. McDonough Green architecture, I suppose, would be an architecture, ultimately, I suppose it's an architecture that would be more restorative than it is destructive. Womack What do you mean by more restorative than destructive? We think architecture, you're building buildings? McDonough Well, when you think about what goes into making a building, and you think about the industrial system that feeds that process, its been said that our industrial system is 93% inefficient. So, if we look at all the natural resources being marshalled to make buildings, for example, and the energy systems that are being put into them, that are inefficient effectively or fossil fuel driven, a building essentially is more destructive than it is restorative, because of the nature of the process of making buildings. So I suppose green architecture attempts to be more like a tree. It would transform natural energy flows into something more fecund, more potent, and give back perhaps even more than it takes. 1 Womack Give me an example of what you're talking about because we think in the United States we're very efficient. You say 93% inefficient. McDonough Inefficient, yeah. We're actually not efficient at all. If you look at the amount of material it takes to do something, and what gets dropped along the way, you find out that we do not have a "cradle to cradle" mentality as I call it. We're still cradle to grave. So, we're looking at starting a new industrial revolution where products go back into closed cycles. So that, for example, a chair would go back to the factory from whence it came and become a chair again in the future. Womack Why isn't that happening now? McDonough I think because we haven't needed to. I think because the system has sort of evolved this way. Cheap raw materials, cheap energy. I think people are now realizing that it's not just the first cost, it's also the long term cost, the cost to the persistent toxification to the environment, for example. Womack Tell me what you're doing with buildings to design them so that they can be recycled. McDonough Well, we did a store for Wal-Mart in Lawrence, Kansas where the actual store was designed so that it could become housing in the future. Right now we build all these single purpose buildings. You know people go out and use the lowest common denominator and build a sealed glass office building that could never be converted to housing, for example. And then once the office market changes that building becomes useless. If you think about the loft buildings for example, in Soho or industrial buildings in many communities from the turn of the century, those buildings are adaptable to almost any human use because they had high ceilings, high windows allowed daylight in deep, the high ceilings allowed hot air to stay up high in the summer. They are often massive constructions which allowed for them to store the coldness of the evening for the day, and so on and so forth. So those buildings can be used for almost any human purpose, and over time they've been transformed from warehouses to factories to offices to apartments to artists studios, you name it. And that allows the building to be maintained and keep neighborhoods intact. Womack Tell us about the polish trade center. 2 McDonough That was a competition we won back in 1989 for a skyscraper in Warsaw. And it was the first building I think, internationally, that was seen as sort of breaking the mold a little bit in terms of asking the building to be made from recycled materials and super energy efficient, convertible into housing, it's a fifty story building convertible into housing. Windows all open. And when we met with the client who came to see us he walked into the office, saw the model, it's quite a_ handsome design I think, and he walked into the office and looked at the model on the conference table and he said, "You win". And we said, well, we're not done yet. We, you know, the windows all open so the people can get fresh air if they need it. And he said, "Oh, that's fine". And then we said it's made from recycled materials, aluminum in this case, for the skin. And he said "Oh, that's very nice". And then we said it's convertible into housing in the future and the ceilings are 13 and 1/2 feet, and the daylight gets in very deep and nobody will be more than twenty-five feet from a window, everyone has daylight. We went through this whole litany of things including the fact that the base was made out of panels that look like limestone that were made with concrete including rubble from the war so that it was really ground up and mixed into it little chips of brick and glass steel. So it looked like limestone but it's really meant to be like Phoenix rising from the ashes so there's this symbolic aspect of it. And we went through all this and he said, "Oh that's wonderful, wonderful". And at the end I said, "One more thing, you have to plant ten miles of trees, ten square miles of trees to offset the buildings effects on global warming". Because we had calculated how much energy it took to make the building and how much it took to operate the building and how much CO2 would be produced in that action and then determine the number of trees needed to be planted to replace the oxygen. And he said "Well, you're right, you know, we have to think about this". So he took a, he went off for three days and he came back and he said, "You know, you've got your trees. I've just calculated how much it costs to plant ten square miles of trees in Poland and it's equal to one-tenth of my advertising budget". The project was a theoretical project for the western companies going into Poland. That whole exercise, basicly, was sort of stopped as the government changed. Womack Tell me about your store for Wal-Mart which has gotten a lot of attention in the media. What did you do for Wal-Mart? McDonough Well, we were asked to think about what it would mean for them to think about their stores in more environmentally sensitive ways, and the building we ended up working with them on has no CFC's in it anywhere. We used low toxicity materials wherever possible. The wood for the roof is all from sustainably 3 harvested sources where the forests are maintained and the whole store is conceived for daylighting. Womack That's an interesting concept. When I'm in a large store like a Wal-Mart I never think about the fact that there aren't windows. What does that do to the atmosphere inside the Wal-Mart? McDonough Well, it changes things completely. We think that people would rather spend their days outdoors than indoors. So we try to make our interiors as much like the outdoors as possible. So it changes the color temperatures, as we call them, the fabrics for example look fabulous because you're looking at them under daylight, you don't have to look at something as if you're underwater and then run outside to see what it really looks like. The people that work there love it because they spend their day knowing whether the sun is shining or not. It saves a lot of energy, obviously. That was the main selling point at the beginning because we were uncertain about its effects on retail, but that's now been proven. So it just changes the way you spend your day. You spend your day feeling very refreshed, and you know where you are. Womack You mentioned sustainably harvested wood that was used in the building of Wal-Mart. For those of us who aren't necessarily involved with the environmental movement, what does that mean, and where did you find the wood? McDonough Well it means that you maintain the forest in the state of forest, that's with complex biodiversity. And in that regard our harvesting techniques should be attuned to natural systems. So there are forestry projects, some of which we've actually created, where the forestry is done in tune with nature. In other words it replicates natural treefalls, lightening strikes, so on and so forth. So it's a culling kind of forestry. Womack This concept that you're talking about is difficult though because you don't necessarily get huge quantities of lumber which is why we view forestry the way we have. McDonough Well, yeah, but I mean for how long can we maintain it and what is net effect? I mean if we lose the entire salmon industry on the west coast in the process I don't think we've done a very good balancing act with marshalling our perpetual job creation. Womack 4 How expensive is this re-used cycle and getting woods from sustainably harvested forest? I'm asking this because it's more expensive to renovate an old building than it is to just put up a new one. McDonough Well what we've found is that basically the cost for what we do is about ten percent more than a normal project. If you actually look at the characteristics of these projects, for __ example, in an office building our materials are safer, we have much higher productivity potentials in our office than most people because we're giving people direct outdoor air directed to their face. Each person, each individual has access to daylight, they have access to fresh air. Womack Is that measurable, that increase in productivity? McDonough Yeah, one of the most amazing studies we've just seen is from Lockheed out in California. They can measure up to sixteen percent, which is, to me, astonishing. Actually to me that's a signal, I really have to wonder what they were doing before if that's the nature of the productivity shift. Womack Sixteen percent more increase in productivity with fresh air? McDonough Yeah, with lighting. Actually their case was lighting. From my perspective, if you think about it this way, and this is why our clients who include Fortune 500 companies like our work and allow us to do it and pay for it, is that they recognize that productivity is much more important than the first costs. And if you look at an office building, 200 square feet assigned per person at a hundred dollars a square foot, that's 20,000 dollars you're going to spend on a person's work space. And that person may be earning 40,000 dollars a year, say, or costing the company 40,000 dollars a year with benefits and so on. Well that means you're spending 20,000 dollars on something which might last ten years in terms of your economic evaluations for a person earning 40,000 dollars a year. Which means you're spending two thousand dollars a year on the space for a person earning 40,000. In other words you're spending five percent on their physical space. Now if I spend another thousand dollars on that person's space to make sure they get fresh air delivered to their face, then I'm spending somewhere between a hundred and two hundred dollars a year on that person for their physical space to bring these kinds of benefits to that person. Now, if I get a one percent productivity increase, that's five minutes a day of a person not rubbing red eyes because of interair quality problems, or for 5 feeling very refreshed because they have fresh air in their face or feeling really refreshed because they know whether it's day or night, then I've paid for my, I've doubled the cost of that improvement. Womack You said some of your clients are Fortune 500 companies, are they with you on these figures? McDonough Oh, absolutely. Yeah. Womack Give me an example. McDonough Our clients include Herman Miller corporation, one of the larger furniture companies in the country. Rodell press, the Gap in California, we're working with them. We've done work before with AT&T, city of Chattanooga, things like that. Womack Tell us about your day care center in Germany. McDonough Well it was designed as a, to be like a tree. The building was designed to produce more energy that it required to operate. This way, the building would be like a tree. It would store energy from the summer, for the winter. It would give energy back to the community. We added a public laundry to the daycare center so that the solar heated hot water, free hot water, would be given to the community. So this is a middle class neighborhood, these people who are waiting for their children for example, at the daycare center could do their laundry and have a place to meet and talk with each other and have a civic act occur there. And by providing free hot water, it's a way for the building to actually pay back what we call its embodied energy mortgage. In other words, how much energy did it take to make the building? Wouldn't it be wonderful it the building could actually pay back the amount of energy that was borrowed from some other form, to actually build it? So over time the building is actually producing more than it takes, so it pays back its mortgage. Womack I think that the concept of difficult one, at least for me. gasoline to run the bulldozers? McDonough an energy mortgage is a Are you talking about the. Right. Exactly. And the trucks that brought the concrete block and the amount of energy required to make the cement and so 6 on and so forth. And you see the marvelous thing about just thinking this way, even if you do it on a theoretical basis, is you start to do a balancing act. You start to understand that things have net effects. So you make decisions like, "Let me use a material that's less energy intensive". Because if I use more efficient material then my mortgage is less. A good example would be, for example on a photovoltaya collector. What we're about to see are solar electric collectors that are affordable, that are going to be producing electricity affordably, very soon. Womack Solar panels? McDonough Solar panels. But these are the electrical producing kind. We're going to see them at the utility levels right away. Womack How do you convince people to adopt these ideas? Forgive me but they sound a little touchy, feely, they seem radical. McDonough We need to build models and then be able to let people come in ahd kick the tires. I mean that's all there is to it. A lot of the problem with say, solar work in the seventies from my perspective is that they were thought of in a linear engineering way. People started designing houses that were solar collectors. Well, for a lot of people, a lot of those solar houses were ugly, and they were designed as solar collectors to live in. Well people don't live in solar collectors, they live in houses. So until they see it as something that's part of their own experience and part of their own culture, I don't think it will be generally accepted. So what we're looking at now is fantastic new technologies for solar collectors that are essentially roofing materials. So flat roof buildings, the Wal-Mart's of the world, could have solar collectors on their roofs because the roofing itself would produce electricity. So I think once we have enough experience with these things and people can see them, they'll find them attractive. But it's a bottom line issue as far as I can tell. People, we need to show that they're affordable and they're practical and easy to use, and they work. Womack Thank you so much for joining us on With Good Reason William McDonough. McDonough My pleasure. 7 My guest is William McDonough, an architect who teaches at the University of Virginia. This is With Good Reason. I'm Laura Womack. (MUSIC) |
||||
Local Identifier |
Local Identifier
311
311_1
|
||||
Persons |
Persons
Other (oth): William McDonough (University of Virginia)
|
||||
Genre |
Genre
|
||||
Origin Information |
Origin Information
|
||||
Related Item |
Related Item
|
Language |
English
|
---|---|
Name |
Structural Reform: New Architecture for a New Age (part 1)
|
MIME type |
audio/mpeg
|
Media Use | |
Authored on |
|
Media of |
2202
|
Download
Audio file