1994-01-30: On the Bias: Black and White Perspectives on African-American History
Audio
Audio file
Content type |
Content type
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collection(s) |
Collection(s)
|
||||
Title |
Title
Title
1994-01-30: On the Bias: Black and White Perspectives on African-American History
|
||||
Resource Type |
Resource Type
|
||||
Description |
Description
Vol. II, No. XXXII
Transcription: James Farmer, MWC Edgar Toppin, VSU INTRODUCTION Music Greeting On the Bias WITH GOOD REASON Volume II, Number 5 This is With Good Reason. I'm Laura Womack. Today we are talking about prejudice and African American history. Music Background James Farmer is one of the big six of the sixties civil rights movement. He led the freedom rides across the south. Blacks sat in the front white-only section and white activists rode in the rear black section. The interstate bus rides forced the U.S. government to enforce a Supreme Court ruling outlawing segregation. James Farmer joins us today, along with Dr. Edgar Toppin. Dr. Toppin wrote a textbook called The Black American in U.S. History. In it, he gives a non-dogmatic account of African-American history. INTERVIEW Womack Dr. Toppin, in your book, The Black American in U.S. History, you started with a story of Captain Thomas Phillips, who anchored his slave ship in the Hannibal off the coast of West Africa in 1694 and he was wined and dined by the nation's king, a black man, and in cooperation with this king, he purchased about 700 slaves and set sail for the American colonies. I was interested why you started your book with that particular story? Toppin That was an interesting story to me in that it told about the slavery experience. It helped to disabuse one of the notions that does float around the minds of many persons. That is that somehow Europeans were going into Africa, invading Africa, engaging in warfare against Africans. Yes, some Africans were seized that way, but the great bulk of them were simply sold as part of the normal trafficking, trading in human beings that had been going on all along. European kingdoms had slaves who were prisoners of war, just as all over the world they left slaves who were prisoners of war and they simply sold their service. They had been doing this for centuries before the Europeans came along. They had been selling them to Arab caravans as part of a long series of trade for gold and diamonds, peppers, many other goods and so they were used to selling a few slaves as part of this. What happened with the New World trade was that the slaves became the main focus of the trade and they got trapped into a routine where if they did not buy 1 slaves then the Europeans would sell guns to their enemies, other African kingdoms, who would attack them and take their people and in order to get slaves they had to engage in wars to get slaves to defend their people. So it became a vicious cycle that led to ruin in Africa. Womack So do you think that the absence of some of the imagery of the Africans participating and being complicit in the slave trade, do you think that there's some sort of political motivation in that? In not including images of black Africans selling other black Africans to white Americans for slavery? Farmer People participated in the slave trade in spite of their color. They participated to make money or to get other goods for trading elsewhere. The color wasn't the basic thing, the fundamental thing. They had goods to sell, they had people to sell and they sold them. Blacks sold, whites sold, but that primarily it was blacks who were sold. Womack Whites who've traditionally controlled the curriculum in schools and have not included African Americans in the history, in the telling of the history of this nation, and yet in the history of teaching African American history, sometimes the full role of African Americans isn't necessarily told. If perhaps it might look bad. Toppin What happens is that sometimes historians write unaware of their prejudices and their preconceptions and their own perceptions and images and therefore they don't see things that are there. I think it's a problem of not telling history really in its full dimension. You' re saying African American history as if that's something separate and apart and distinct from the total history. It's not. It is a part of the total history of the nation. The total history of the nation, of the world cannot be understood without including that element. The rise of capitalism was integral with the development and the exploitation of these native peoples, of the black gold that was the African labor that was brought over to the New World. That's all wrapped together. You have to read books like Eric Williams' Capitalism and Slavery in order to understand those kinds of things. That's all part of it. But, the African American aspects of that history have not been brought in nearly as much as some of the other aspects have been brought in, it's been grossly neglected. Farmer Let me intervene here a minute if I may interrupt. Back about 1966 when Black Power, in quotes, came into vogue, along with that came a demand for black studies, black history, etcetera. They were 2 studying events through the eyes of Europeans. Some students, black students, complained that they studied music and came out knowing nothing about jazz. In fact, if they had mentioned jazz at all in their studies, they were told that George Gershwin discovered jazz. And so this sparked a demand for the studying of the contributions of African Americans to history of America and the history of the world. We won that battle in part. University after university initiated ethnic studies or black studies and classes were set up, teachers were brought in and this threw off sparks. Hispanics began demanding Hispanic studies. Threw off sparks elsewhere too. Women began demanding the study of women's contributions. I think it enlarged the boundaries of the mind of this nation. Womack So don't-now these courses exist and we have full departments devoted to them, don't you think the situation is better now? Do you think that- Farmer I think there has been an improvement. Womack But some people would say that on college campuses it's very difficult to even have an open discussion about African-American history or current events within the African-American sub- community Farmer Why? Womack . still as a part of a community. Because of the feeling, because of the bad feeling I think, and there is still bad feeling between whites and blacks in this country. There is a feeling that on college campuses you can't openly discuss African American history within the context of larger you know the total history with any sort of objectivity because you have to be sensitive to hurt feelings. Farmer What you are aiming at here is a most interesting phenomenon. In the sixties we were fighting for a kind of integration. King described it in his dream, you know, where blacks and whites could associate together, and children hold hands and people be judged by the content of character and not the color of skin. Well, since then there has been an increased balkanization of our society. An increased polarization on the basis of race. Recently there was an interview with some black students on ... Toppin "Sixty Minutes" 3 Farmer ... a university campus in North Carolina I think. Toppin It was Duke University. Farmer Duke University. And they insisted that they wanted separation! They wanted things to be separate but equal. Womack That's right! Farmer Those were familiar words. Womack Yes! Farmer From way back in the sixties and before they said we don't want to eat with whites. We don't want to sit with them. We want to be by ourselves and do our own thing. Well now, I would interpret that and I'd like to hear Dr. Toppin's-his comments. I would interpret that as a kind of swing of the pendulum. In the sixties and before that, we were asking a sort of self-abnegation of blacks. We were saying, "Forget your color. Think of yourself as a human being and if you can get a little money and a little education, you will become white. And just integrate and merge with society. You'll be a part of the melting pot." Well, that didn't really work and at the same time (cough) there was Malcolm X and the Nation of Islam saying, "No, no, no. We can't integrate. We've got to separate and do our own thing because the white man hates us so let us separate." That voice-the voice of separation-soon became the louder and also the more raucous voice from 1966 on through the early seventies with Black Power, etcetera. There was another swing of the pendulum from integration to Black Nationalism or separation. Now, I think we're running into a kind of synthesis of the two. Womack The phenomenon you're talking about at this point seems to be sort of divisive between ethnic minorities and whites. Toppin May I cut in on this? Farmer and Womack Please do. Toppin There are several things. First, the idea that you've mentioned 4 about Black Nationalism and separatism and so forth, this is something that's been around a very long time. This isn't brand new. Farmer That's right. Toppin There were blacks who were proposing early in the Eighteenth Century that we should leave this country and go back to Africa because we'd never be treated fairly here. Farmer (Yeah?} Toppin There are many blacks down to the present who still think this, and perhaps with some justification. W.E.B. DuBois early in the twentieth century, in the early nineteen hundreds raised the question, "Am I black? Am I an American? Can I be both?" Farmer 1903 Toppin Right. Can I make a contribution as a black man? Can I give to the nation out of my black blood without having doors slammed in my face because I am black? Farmer Yeah. Toppin And this is the problem that blacks have always had to address. Womack What's the answer today? Toppin The same problem prevails today. The same problem prevails. Do you have to submerge your black identity and melt into a larger totality or can you remain black? But what I also want to separate out from all of this, because you're talking about perceptions and feelings of young people today, and perhaps many oldsters, is this whole matter of African American history which has nothing at all to do with such feelings. I have no trouble teaching it to all kinds of groups, black groups, white groups, integrated groups. I have no trouble teaching it because you approach-it's how you approach it. Whether you approach it as an intellectual discipline in which all of us have something to learn and which I as the teacher am open and willing to learn things from my students or if you approach it in either an antagonistic or authoritarian manner 5 which some people do and which it jars people and throws them off and just leads to all sorts of antagonisms. Parmer Bravo! Bravo! Womack Maybe the two of you could help me out here because you're both teaching African-American history in very different environments. Mr. Farmer, you're teaching at Mary Washington. Parmer Yeah Womack And from the descriptions I've read of your classrooms, there are a bunch of very young, white kids in your class who are just agog at what you're saying to them and are completely amazed at your telling them that there were separate facilities for whites and blacks. Parmer Yeah Womack And so these people have no ability to relate to what you' re talking about and Dr. Toppin, you're teaching at Virginia State University which is largely African American students. Toppin No,no,no. I've got to correct you there. Womack Okay, correct me on my misperception. Toppin Virginia State is a historically black institution. Most of our students are black. But in the graduate level about half of my graduate students are white students. Womack I just wanted to know if there is a difference teaching to a white audience versus teaching to a black audience. Parmer Oh, of course. Womack Tell me. Parmer Great difference. There are sensitivities on both sides. But the 6 sensitivities are quite different. Now if I'm talking to a white audience, I know that the sensitivity is going to be on affirmative action. They consider that affirmative action victimizes them. The young whites, the young white males think they are the victims of affirmative action. Womack I've heard that too. Do you disagree? Toppin I do, 100 percent. Farmer Of course I disagree, very much so. But they have their perceptions and you've got to start with where they are and then help them move from that point. Womack Okay, well help us here a little bit now, because I think there are a lot of people who share that feeling that white males are the victims of affirmative action. Farmer They think they're the victims today and that the only discrimination is in reverse. Toppin The other thing they quite often say to you is that-and you hear this said many,many times: "I didn't own slaves, My parents and grandparents didn't own slaves. We didn't have anything to do with that slavery down there, so why are you mad with us? Farmer Why penalize me? Toppin We didn't do anything to you. Farmer Yeah! Toppin They don't know that today, we're not talking about yesterday or we're not talking about 1860. Today there is discrimination in the workplace each and every day. Farmer Everyday. Toppin They've run all kinds of tests to show that two applicants, black and white, evenly matched, go into a jobplace, the interviewers 7 will take the white through all kinds of things and get them a job and will send the black out within five minutes ... Farmer Right Toppin ... without even giving him a chance. Farmer Another thing you don't realize, Dr. Toppin, is that they were beneficiaries of the things that their great great grandparents did two hundred years ago or three hundred years ago, from the life savings the grandparents raised from the lifestyles that their grandparents were able to give them so they benefited while the black kids were penalized by the status in society which they held. Now, this we have to make the young people realize. Now blacks have a sensitivity too. The blacks have a sensitivity and think that all of the things that afflict them are because of racism, white racism and there is a tendency for blacks to blame everything on racism and nothing on himself. We do that and that's a crutch and we have to help our young people stop doing that. BRIDGE Womack Let's talk a little bit now about the civil rights movement. This isn't a new question, but do either one of you think that we gained anything from the civil rights movement? Toppin Okay, what the laws do is to remove some of the outward vestiges of discrimination. We've made progress, tremendous progress. I came along at a time-and so did James, so we're not that far dissimilar in age. I think we're probably about the same age. Farmer Oh, I'm older than you are. Toppin Not much, I'm sixty-five. Farmer Oh, I'm seventy-three, young man. Toppin All right, you got eight years on me, but we both came along at a time when we knew that blacks were not supposed to be seriously in love on the screen, or on the theatre stages. When blacks were jokes and comical relief only. When they did movies in a way so that they could cut out the black segment whenever it got down to the South and they did it regularly. Or when textbooks were written with a black segment-I mean with a Northern version and a Southern 8 version. The publishers admit this. I've talked to them. They had a Southern version, a Northern version of their textbooks. We've come along, seen a lot of these things. Parmer I think what we did was to kill Jim Crow. That is U.S. -style apartheid. Toppin Right. Parmer We got rid of that with a front-the back seat of the bus. The "For Colored" and "For White" signs. We eliminated those things, but as Dr. Toppin said, we did not get rid of racism. Racism is the belief that skin color, hair texture, the physical characteristics which we call race has something to do with human qualities such as intelligence, character, morality. Now anthropologists have told us for generations that that's a lie. That's what we must do in the next generation of freedom fighters is eliminate racism. Womack Okay, well I really wanted to ask you about-we were talking earlier about perceptions of African American history and incidents in the past. And one of the things that I thought was really interesting, Mr. Farmer, was in your book, Lay Bear the Heart, you're picture, your portrait of Dr. King is not a very flattering one I just have to say and ... Parmer I intended for it to be flattering. Womack Well, I think you gave him credit... Parmer I tried. Womack You tried, well we'll address that in a minute. You gave him credit for-you definitely gave him credit for what he did, but you also included in there a story about how he invited you and your freedom riders to dinner and then failed to pick up the check. Parmer I have grown to wish that I had left that out of the book. Womack Does everyone ask you about that? Parmer A few people have asked me about it. 9 Womack I guess my question is, first of all, you did a whole lot to demystify him. I think that we ... Farmer Yeah Toppin That's important Womack tend to not think of him as ... Farmer The audience doesn't know what you were talking about there. Womack Okay. Farmer He invited the freedom riders, 13, 14 of us, to dinner in Atlanta and I had to pick up the tab. Womack That's right. Now that's not the image of this very religious, dedicated, selfless leader ... Farmer Well, he figured I had a budget for it and why shouldn't I spend that budget? Womack Okay, so tell us a little bit about your perception of Dr. King and why you say "I tried to paint a positive portrait." Why would you have to try to paint a positive. Farmer What I was faced with in writing the book was the myth which has grown up about him. He's been deified so much, and I had to deal with the Martin Luther King that I knew. The so-called big six, the leaders of civil rights organizations, met about once a month in New York under the Council on United Civil Rights Leadership. We got quite well acquainted, we argued, we debated, we discussed and compared notes. We were peers then, and that's difficult to say today because nobody can conceptualize that. He was head of one organization, I was head of another. Toppin But Laura, I think part of what the problem is also is that people seem to think that blacks are a monolithic group, and we're not. We disagree with each other, we don't have just one leader, and as Mr. Farmer has well said, sometimes we do get to the point in America 10 that we as a people tend to take, that as American people, tend to take some one person and personify a whole movement or a whole group or a whole order by that person and deify that person almost. But King was just one among many other civil rights leaders. He got more publicity and more attraction, he wasn't even the biggest light in Montgomery at first... Farmer No. Toppin ...in that first boycott. He emerged to the fore partly because he could be more of a compromise candidate between other really zealous, I mean leading stars there as well. Womack At one point early in your book, you were talking about a march that was planned in the South, and this was when you were in Chicago and you were holding sit-ins and demonstrations and Farmer In the early forties. Womack In the early forties. And you were going into cafeterias, restaurants, skating rinks, swimming pools, and I believe that it was Phillip Randolph who wanted to do a march or I think even a bus ride in the South, and you at that time put together an article for the Core publication that said that it was too dangerous at that time, that people would be hurt and people would be killed. Looking back now, and realizing that people were hurt and people were killed in the sixties and the late fifties, do you think, are you glad that you wrote that article or do you think that. Farmer Well, it wasn't an article, no it was a symposia which I edited, asking a number of prominent blacks and whites whether A. Phillip Randolph's call for the beginning of mass civil disobedience in the South against Jim Crow in all places of public accommodation was an appropriate thing without training, without discipline, without preparation. No, I think that we were right on that, I was right, and I believe that Phil was wrong. He came to agree with me. We discussed it after the symposia came out, symposium came out and he read it. Womack And it didn't happen. Parmer No, he called it off. Womack 11 Are you glad that he called it off? Farmer Yeah Womack Do you think that maybe it would've happened faster, we would be further? Farmer It would have been a blood-letting throughout the South at that time. Toppin Terrible blood-letting. Farmer It just would have been disaster, and those who were calling it would have been back up at their homes, their apartments, their offices in New York while the people would be down there in the South facing the hurricane. Toppin And sometimes a premature move can set a movement back farther rather than to move it along because the very fact that you've tried and failed so dismally ... Farmer Yeah Toppin ... will discourage a lot of people ... Farmer Exactly! Toppin ... and will scare off a lot of people. No, the timing is very important, you've got to start at the right time. Farmer I'm often wrong, but I was right then. Womack How do either one of you think that history down the line, I mean we're already a few years behind the civil rights, but how do you think that history will see Dr. King? Do you think that his. Farmer Oh, history will see Dr. King as it sees him now. He can't get any bigger. He will not get any smaller. He'll be a permanent enormous figure in history. 12 Toppin If anything, his stature will grow rather than diminish. Womack Let me ask you about some other people who, how do you think history will deal with them? Jesse Jackson. Farmer Not too kindly. Not too kindly. Toppin I've not been very much impressed with Jesse Jackson. Farmer No, no, no. Toppin He's struck me as much more opportunist. Farmer Posturer. Toppin Posturer. Farmer Headline-grabber. Running to the camera. Toppin I always thought of people like Andrew Young as much more solid than Jesse Jackson. Farmer Yeah. Womack What about Douglas Wilder? Toppin Douglas wilder is one of the most astute politicians in America today. Farmer Yes Toppin And I don't think we've seen the last of Doug Wilder when he finishes his term as governor. Farmer No, we haven't seen the last of him. 13 Toppin Doug Wilder is either going to sit in the Senate or he's going to be the vice president of the United States one of these days. He's a very astute politician. He's going on to other places. Womack How do you think history will deal with James Farmer? Either one of you. Farmer History is going to ignore him largely. Toppin No, no, that's not true. Womack I don't think so either. Toppin As the history of the Civil Rights Movement is written James Farmer will loom larger and larger because CORE was one of the key and crucial organizations. It provided some of the basis for what Martin Luther King did with his movement that stressed that you can resist, you can defy, you can fight back, but you don't have to do it with a hateful spirit and you don't have to do it with guns. Farmer James Farmer had many weaknesses. One of his greatest weaknesses as a leader is that he did not have a sense of power, did not appreciate power, understand it or enjoy power. I, in fact, I felt uncomfortable with power. I could move a crowd. I could move a huge audience and make them go out and jump off a cliff, but I was not comfortable with that because if I could do that with oratory, I felt somebody else could come in and move them similarly by making a speech just as good or better and move them to do opposite things. And that made me very uncomfortable. A Hitler could move them. Toppin Demagogues always have. Farmer A Mussolini. Toppin Demogagues always have. Farmer Yes, demogagues have. Toppin But you'll never stop the demogagues by not... yourself. 14 Farmer I know, firmly. but I shuddered at power and thus hesitated to use it Womack Do you Farmer And gave it up voluntarily when I left CORE. Womack Do you think that there are any leaders for the African Americans- I know you said before that it's not a monolithic group, and I'm appreciative of that-Are there any people you think now who are leaders of that caliber-the James Farmer's, the Martin Luther King's? Farmer King? No. Toppin No, I think because of the fact that we don't have the same common level of oppression, the segregation laws, the disenfranchisement, the lynchings, the brutality, the brutal oppression, the general suppression, because those no longer exist, you're not going to find-to me I don't think you'll find a leader arising to tackle those. Womack Do you streets, the next think that the fight for equality has moved from the the buses, the lunch counters into the board room? Is that Farmer Board rooms. Toppin That's one area. Farmer It's moved into all rooms. All kinds of rooms. Toppin Lot's of other areas. Womack Right now in Congress there are 40 representatives and senators who make up the Black Caucus and they were a power when Bill Clinton was trying to pass his budget this last year. What do you think of that? That obviously says that there's been some progress made. Toppin 15 They're a block and an important block and they will continue to be an important block. There will always be blocks and there will continue to be other blocks in other areas. It just takes time to wipe out some of this racism that's so deeply rooted. It takes a lot of educating of people. It takes a lot of getting people to see things in their past that people just don't seem to realize. And people like Jim Farmer and myself try to go out and talk to people and educate people. That's why we're both teaching at colleges and trying to reach as many people as we can and we're delighted to have a chance to be on your show and reach some people. Womack Well, I appreciate you saying that. I want to thank you both very much for being on "With Good Reason." I really enjoyed having you. Farmer Thank You. Toppin Thank you very much. Farmer Enjoyed it. MUSIC WE're born believing we're greater than circumstance Infinitely stronger then chance As our first breath is handed We taste the double standard The need to wear the mask And with society's nuturing The psychic plastic surgery Begins to take effect As our souls watch astounded our characters flounder Duplicitous identity Diction and contradiction Have become the skills Of assimilation Razor honed to perfection From the moment of creation It's gone from identity crises to survival slingshot rifle Sin to revival Try to get looked at But not poked in the eyeball OUTRO Womack Our guests today are Dr. Edgar Toppin, African American historian at Virginia State University and James Farmer, Civil Rights leader 16 and professor at Mary Washington College. On our next show we'll talk about African .American poetry. This is With Good Reason. I'm Laura Womack Announcer With Good Reason is a production of Virginia's public radio stations and the Virginia Higher Education Broadcasting Consortium. This program was produced with the assisstance of Mary Washington College, Virginia State University and WFLS Radio. Speical thanks to WMRA radio. "Famous and Dandy" was written and performed by Hiphoprisy. The views expressed in this show are not necessarily those of the consortium or this radio station. The project coordinator for With Good Reason is Michael McDowell. Laura Womack is the producer. Carolyn Elliott Sundquist is the Associate Producer. Kevin Piccini wrote the theme music. If you would like to receive tapes or transcripts, call the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia at area code (804) 225- 2632. Music 17 |
||||
Local Identifier |
Local Identifier
2322
2322_1
|
||||
Persons |
Persons
Other (oth): James Farmer (University of Mary Washington)
Other (oth): Edgar Toppin (Virginia State University)
|
||||
Genre |
Genre
|
||||
Origin Information |
Origin Information
|
||||
Related Item |
Related Item
|
Language |
English
|
---|---|
Name |
On the Bias: Black and White Perspectives on African-American History
|
MIME type |
audio/mpeg
|
Media Use | |
Authored by | |
Authored on |
|
Media of |
2633
|
Download
Audio file